Investing 101 Investing 101: Hidden Fees in No-Load Funds Read the Article Open Share Drawer Share this:Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) Written by Mint.com Published Aug 31, 2010 3 min read Advertising Disclosure The views expressed on this blog are those of the bloggers, and not necessarily those of Intuit. Third-party blogger may have received compensation for their time and services. Click here to read full disclosure on third-party bloggers. This blog does not provide legal, financial, accounting or tax advice. The content on this blog is "as is" and carries no warranties. Intuit does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy, reliability, and completeness of the content on this blog. After 20 days, comments are closed on posts. Intuit may, but has no obligation to, monitor comments. Comments that include profanity or abusive language will not be posted. Click here to read full Terms of Service. (photo: iStockphoto) One of the primary advantages in mutual fund investing is its simplicity compared to owning stocks — or so some investors believe. It’s true that professional management, diversification, and the ease of reinvesting earnings, are all great advantages. But when you pick one mutual fund over another, are you sure you are getting the fund that offers the lowest fees? All professionally managed funds charge a management fee, and that is typically about 1.5% of annual net asset value. But beyond this fee charged by all managed funds, a range of other fees — some obvious and others less so — can also be charged. The best-known of these fees is the load, which is a commission taken from funds invested to pay a salesperson. The comparison between load and no-load funds is not as straightforward as it seems at first glance. A “load fund” charges a load, or sales commission. This is applied either up front (taken out of investment dollars) or as a back-load, assessed upon sale of shares. A back load may also be called a “redemption fee.” A no-load fund does not charge a sales commission of any kind. Simple enough; but there is more. Some funds, including many so-called no-load funds, charge fees of different types and names. To make a truly valid comparison between different funds, you need to understand what those fees are and how expensive it is to own shares of a no-load fund. One of the most audacious of these fees is the so-called 12b-1 fee. This is a fee charged to investors to pay for the marketing and promotion of the fund. It may range between 0.25% and 0.75% of asset value every year, and is included in the fund’s expense ratio. That 12b-1 fee may seem like a small percentage, but over time, it adds up to a significant difference in investment outcome. Consider this example: A 100% no-load earning 9% annual net return per year yields $295 per $1,000 after three years. $1,000 (1.09)3 = $1,295, yield $295 With a 5% front-end load, the same investment yields only $230 per $1,000. $1,000 – 5% = $950. year 1: $950 x 1.09 = $1,035.50 year 2: $1,035.50 x 1.09 = $1,128.95 year 3: $1,128.95 x 1.09 = $1,230.28, yield $230.28 Take out 12b-1 fees every year in addition to the front-end loand, and your real return can be drastically reduced, even with compounding. In other words, 9% is not always 9%, because fees and the timing of their assessment change what you really earn. Not all no-load funds charge a 12b-1 fee. Those that do not are called “true no-load” funds. There are still other types of fees you may encounter when researching your investments. Funds, load and no-load, may assess “custodial” or “managerial,” or “administrative” fees. So a fund advertising itself as a no-load may end up paying salespeople through assessment of a fee with a different name. If those fees are collected every year and based on your net asset value, they will add up to much more than an up-front load charged for the same commission. With the many names given to fees, making accurate comparisons is complex. But there is help. The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority offers a free mutual fund fee analyzer that compares the overall cost structure of different funds. Check it out for yourself here — and remember, a sales load by any other name is still a sales load. Michael C. Thomsett is author of over 60 books, including Winning with Stocks and Annual Reports 101 (both published by Amacom Books), and Getting Started in Stock Investing and Trading (John Wiley and Sons, scheduled for release in Fall, 2010). He lives in Nashville, Tennessee and writes full time. Investing 101: Hidden Fees in No-Load Funds was provided by Minyanville.com. Previous Post Short Selling: Sexy or Dangerous? Next Post Investing 101: Portfolio Management Made Easy Written by Mint.com More from Mint.com Browse Related Articles Mint App News Intuit Credit Karma welcomes all Minters! Retirement 101 5 Things the SECURE 2.0 Act changes about retirement Home Buying 101 What Are Homeowners Association (HOA) Fees and What Do … Financial Planning What Are Tax Deductions and Credits? 20 Ways To Save on… Financial Planning What Is Income Tax and How Is It Calculated? Investing 101 The 15 Best Investments for 2023 Investing 101 How To Buy Stocks: A Beginner’s Guide Investing 101 What Is Real Estate Wholesaling? Life What Is A Brushing Scam? Financial Planning WTFinance: Annuities vs Life Insurance