Financial Planning You Can’t Publish That! 3 Wiki War Stories and What You Can Learn From Them Read the Article Open Share Drawer Share this: Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn Written by Mint.com Published May 23, 2013 4 min read Advertising Disclosure The views expressed on this blog are those of the bloggers, and not necessarily those of Intuit. Third-party blogger may have received compensation for their time and services. Click here to read full disclosure on third-party bloggers. This blog does not provide legal, financial, accounting or tax advice. The content on this blog is "as is" and carries no warranties. Intuit does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy, reliability, and completeness of the content on this blog. After 20 days, comments are closed on posts. Intuit may, but has no obligation to, monitor comments. Comments that include profanity or abusive language will not be posted. Click here to read full Terms of Service. A funny thing happened about a year ago to the consumer advocacy wiki that I edit. It disappeared. I continued to publish the site, which lists the names, addresses and phone numbers of the executives for most major American companies. It was still visible if you knew where to look for it, on its slightly unwieldy address, Onyoursi.de. But for most folks, the site just disappeared. It was invisible to the major search engines, and especially Google, which it depended on for its traffic. Was it an algorithm change — or something else? If you guessed “something else,” give yourself a pat on the back. Turns out someone — it’s not clear who — set out to lower the site’s visibility through a series of search engine optimization (SEO) tricks. No need to go into details, but suffice it to say, they didn’t want the site to be seen. Maybe there was information on it they didn’t want their customers to see. That’s understandable. Here are the most common requests I get from companies, and what you can learn from them. “If you don’t remove the names of our executives, we’ll sue you.” Some companies don’t like having the name and contact information of their executives online for the world to see, and they believe a letter from an attorney will scare me into submission. It’s been tried, and it doesn’t really work. I did, however, remove the cell phone number of a CEO that had been posted in the comments — but only after he’d answered the reader’s question. What it says about the company: Any business that doesn’t want its customer service managers to be contacted must not care very much about customer service. Stay far away! “Your information is incorrect, but we aren’t going to tell you who the right contacts are.” This is only slightly more helpful than being slapped with a lawsuit. It plays on my insecurities, that somehow I’m misleading consumers, while at the same time saying: That information is no one’s business but ours. It’s a disservice to everyone, including the company’s own public image. I recently had a whole hotel chain tell me, “All the information is wrong” without offering a fix. What is says about the company: We would rather have emails to our executives bounce than go through. That’s right, we really don’t want to hear from you little consumers. Again, that’s probably a company you don’t want to do business with. “Please delete our executive’s names and replace them with a generic link to our ‘contact us’ page.” That’s an understandable reaction. No one wants the name of a company’s VP of customer service splattered across the Internet, even if you go to great lengths to ask customers to only contact that person as a last resort. But at the same time, pointing a customer right back to the same place they came from is problematic. Often, it just sends them round and round in a circle, without getting a resolution. What it says about a company: Any company that says the “contact” page and 800-number is the only way to contact it is probably more interested in containing a consumer problem than solving it. Avoid any business that wants to avoid talking to you. The bottom line. The best companies actually like being on the wiki, because they are eager to speak with their customers. If something can’t be resolved, they’d rather a manager see the problem before it goes to court, so having the executive’s phone number and email address published online is no problem for them. Interestingly, I’ve had several companies ask to be put on the wiki. Those are the ones that really get it. The more barriers a company puts between you and the person in charge of customer service, the worse the customer service usually is. And companies that don’t hide from you — well, they normally have nothing to hide from. They offer a terrific product at a reasonable price, and they deserve your business. Oh, and in case you were wondering, the SEO gods smiled upon the wiki a few months ago. Now, everyone can see it again. Christopher Elliott is a consumer advocate who blogs about getting better customer service at On Your Side. Connect with him on Twitter and Facebook or send him your questions by email. Previous Post Financial Resources for American Veterans Next Post Money Talks: What Your Kids Want to Know About Money Written by Mint.com More from Mint.com Browse Related Articles Mint App News Intuit Credit Karma welcomes all Minters! Retirement 101 5 Things the SECURE 2.0 Act changes about retirement Home Buying 101 What Are Homeowners Association (HOA) Fees and What Do They Cover? Financial Planning What Are Tax Deductions and Credits? 20 Ways To Save on Taxes Financial Planning What Is Income Tax and How Is It Calculated? Investing 101 The 15 Best Investments for 2023 Investing 101 How To Buy Stocks: A Beginner’s Guide Investing 101 What Is Real Estate Wholesaling? Life What Is A Brushing Scam? Financial Planning WTFinance: Annuities vs Life Insurance